ženska ejakulacija

Jaz mislim, da se to razlozi cisto enostavno. Vse zenske so mokre, tu se verjetno strinjamo? Po moje se tistim, ki kao “ejakulirajo”, izloci med orgazmom vec te sluzi, kot drugim. Nima se smisla s tem ubada, glavno da uzivate. 🙂

Sicer pa, zenska prostata ja. 🙂

Ja se strinjam…

Sicer pa novinarji itak znajo vse napihnit in zadevo naredit zanimivo… kje so pa znanstveni dokazi (iz uglednih virov, ki jim lahko 100% zaupaš… jih ponavadi ni)…

Itak je 100x bolj zanimivo če rečeš ŽENSKA EJAKULACIJA kot pa …povečano izločanje gl.vestibularis major (zeeehhh… utruja z znanstvenimi….zzzzZzzZzzz…)…

Sicer pa delajo ženskam bolj škodo k korist – če mene prašaš… krnaenkrat se bojo začele vse sekirat, ker ne doživijo tega – al bo pa to novo merilo za dober seks… 🙂

Ja ravno to sem mislo s tistim, da glavno da uzivajo. Ce se bodo zacele sekirat zarad neke ejakulacije in si pri tem po moznosti predstavljale se spricanje pol metra dalec….vemo kak psiha deluje na orgazem. Uzivajte zenske pa se malo manj obremenjujte! 🙂

svoj nick si najd

10 – 75%??? Res nisem doma na področju statistike, a vseeno se mi zdi to hudo nezanesljivo. Drugače pa škoda besed …

…ma nemoj…

Gostek, meni tudi ni jasno, katera žleza naj bi to bila, saj so v tisti oddaji res omenjali “neko” prostato, ni mi jasno… :-)))
Prišlo pa naj bi do te ejakulacije ob stimulaciji Garfenbergove točke (G točka).
In tisti, ki pravite, da naj bi to bilo samo malo več sluzi, ste mogoče spregledali podatek, ko sem napisala, da so analizirali to tekočino, pa ni ne sluz ne urin! Očitno gre za neko čudo! :))
Me pa niti ne čudi, da do zdaj niso vedeli za to, glede na to, da se svet pač vrti okoli moških, saj – kako dolgo pa se recimo sploh ni vedelo, da ženska TUDI lahko doživi orgazem, glej, glej, a one tudi, ali kaj??? :)))

Manja le lepo vprašala, večina pa se jih iz tega dela norca. Kakšna pa se je le okorajžila in povedala, da je tudi kaj takega možno.

To je res. Evo, od petih sta bili dve, ki se jima je to redno dogajalo. Ne vedno, ampak lahko res precej intenzivno. Smo pač imeli pod ritjo še brisačo za vsak slučaj. Lahko zadeva tudi izgine za več mesecev.
Sicer se je tako ena kot druga nad tem začudila, kaj je to in ji je bilo nerodno. Pa sem rekel, potem je to že res, kar sem nekoč bral, pa v to “glupost” ne verjel.
Tega je lahko kar precej, tudi za pol deci. Ali nič. Ziher pa ne bo, če je že enkrat. Mora miniti vsak kak dan. Vonj … ga ne znam opisat.

Na netu tudi obstajajo video na to temo. Potem sem to videl tudi v enem ali dveh porničih.

Tudi vse ostale so zelo rade imele sex, vendar o tem nikoli ne duha ne sluha. Tako se sedaj s tem ne ukvarjam, da to mora obstajati. Najhuje je, če hočeš to točko najti in se s tem trudiš. Nasilno iskanje tega pelje v katastrofo. Skratka, uživat se da s tem ali brez tega.

Ko bo v anatomskih atlasih, fiziloških, histoloških učbenikih, ko mi bojo to predavali profesorji ali pa ko bom prebral verodostojno znanstveno študijo z dokazi… bom verjel… zaenkrat tega še nisem zasledil nikjer…

Če maš kak link (pa ne iz strani/študije ene emancipirane feministične seksologinje), se priporočam. 🙂

Glede na zmožnosti medicine in znanosti dandanes bi res lahko ugotovili vse 100% (ne pa khm 10-75%)… …svet pa tudi ni več tok moški, da bi to kej oviralo take raziskave… da ne govorim… sploh nebi blo kej dost za raziskovat – samo pregledat/stestirat tok in tok žensk…

Gostek to so take ameriske raziskave, ki se vcasij znajdejo tudi na 24ur.com. Recimo enkrat je pisalo, da kdor prakticira oralni sex zivi dlje. Drugic je pisalo, da so ribe zelo inteligentne (primati v vodi) ter da imajo tradicijo, kulturo in neke take. Smeh! 🙂

Gostek

Ti si zgleda rojen duhovnik. Dokler niso dokazali, da se Sonce ne vrti okoli Zemlje, so nasprotnike sežigali.

seveda da to doživljajo!!!
preverjeno.

Nasprotniki so bili znanstveniki, ki so nasprotno duhovnikom dokazovali na podlagi točno določenih zakonov, ki še danes veljajo in se ne menjajo skupaj s politično garnituro. Poleg tega, so oni znanstvenike sežigali, gostek samo noče sprejeti nekih trditev, dokler niso postrežene na isti način, kot so nekateri pred stoletji dokazovali da je zemlja okrogla. Samo, hja, bolj me skrbi, da prihajamo v čase, ko to kar želi gostek ni več potrebno, saj smo vsi blazno pametni v vsem, strokovnjaki na vseh področjih, in da se bo ponovila situacija izpred stoletij. Da se bo spet začelo zažigati tiste, ki se ne sprijaznijo kar naenkrat z neko novonastalo trditvijo, temveč bodo zahtevali prave dokaze.

Del obširnega teksta iz interneta o teh stvareh:

If you were to refer to literature over the last 50 years you would be lead to believe that females have only been able to ejaculate since about 1980. Of course this is absurd, and just shows how “the experts” can be wrong for decades on just about anything. Many knew the experts were wrong, but had little success in convincing anyone. Needless to say this lead to many problems, needless surgery (to fix the poor women who would ejaculate), expensive counselling (got to find out what happened when they were children to cause this “problem”), and in some cases divorce. “The G Spot” by Alice Kahn Ladas, Beverly Whipple, and John D. Perry, has dozens of letters from women who went though various personal tragedies because they would ejaculate during lovemaking. Doctors, gynaecologists, and psychiatrists invariably told them they were peeing and needed either surgery or psychotherapy.
Newsweek published an article entitled “Just How the Sexes Differ” in May of 1981. One of the major difference was listed was that men ejaculate, but women do not. However, Aristotle wrote about female ejaculation, and Galen knew about it in the second century. The female prostate, which generates the fluid which is ejaculated, was described in some detail by De Graaf in his “New Treatise Concerning the Generative Organs of Women”. (1) “… during the sexual act it discharges to lubricate the tract so copiously that it even flows outside the pudenda. This is the matter which may have been taken to be actual female semen.” He describes the fluid as “rushing out” with “impetus” and “in one gush.” (2)

The medical community was finally awakened in 1980 when Perry and Whipple showed a film of a female ejaculating to the SSSS (Society for the Scientific Study of Sex). Martin Weisberg, M.D., a gynecologist at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia responded, “Bull … I spend half my waking hours examining, cutting apart, putting together, removing, or rearranging female reproductive organs. There is no female prostrate, and women don’t ejaculate.”
Yet after seeing the film and witnessing the event in person he changed his tune: “The vulva and vagina were normal with no abnormal masses or spots. The urethra was normal. Everything was normal. She then had her partner stimulate her by inserting two fingers into the vagina and stroking along the urethra lengthwise. To our amazement, the area began to swell. It eventually became a firm one by two cm oval area distinctly different from the rest of the vagina. In a few moments the subject seemed to perform a Valsalva maneuver (bearing down as if starting to defecate) and seconds later several cc’s of milky fluid shot out the urethra. The material analysis described in the paper (Perry & Whipple’s) is correct, its composition was closest to prostatic fluid”.
Fluid Characteristics
The ejaculate is very much like prostrate fluid. It is usually clear, or milky and as thin as water. It does not have the look, smell or taste of urine. It is almost odorless. The taste varies, depending on the time of the month and diet, and possibly other factors, such as amount of stimulation received prior to ejaculating or time since the last ejaculation. It can vary from an almost honey sweet, sour, bitter, or a combination of these tastes.
Even though it is ejaculated from the urethra, it is most definitely not urine. It is absolutely impossible to pee during a orgasm unless there is a weak pubococcygeus muscle. This is very important, and it is important for the female and her partner to both understand this. The pubococcygeus muscle contracts when terminating a stream of urine, and is the muscle which contracts during orgasm. This contraction helps prevent retrograde ejaculation (ejaculation back into the bladder), and of course prevents the bladder from draining during orgasm.

I highly recommend “The G Spot” for further reading.
Footnotes:
1) Regnier de Graal, “New Treatise Concerning the Generative Organs of Women”, p. 107
2) Alice Kahn Ladas, Beverly Whipple and John D. Perry, “The G Spot” page 59. Dell Publishing 1982.

Ravno nasprotno…rojen znanstvenik. Dokler ni dokazana stvar, ne mores rect da obstaja. 🙂 Ravno duhovniki trdijo o nedokazljivem. 😉

No, hvala Matjaž2, končno nekdo z uporabnimi informacijami!
Saj nekaj podobnega so takrat razlagali na Discoveryju v oddaji o spolnosti, je bila cela oddaja o tem.
S tole G-točko je pa točno tako, kot je napisano v tem tekstu, samose nisem znala tako spretno izrazit – nič ne pomaga znanstvenikom secirat in iskat te zadeve na razseciranem truplu, saj je to nekaj, kar se pojavi oziroma pride mnogo bolj do izraza ravno v tistem trenutku vzburjenja, orgazma itd, kar pa bo pri trupelcu malo težje… :))

Tako da, gostek, malo več prakse in manj teorije, pa bo… ;-)))

Gostek ni sposoben najti ene od takih zensk. Zato ne obstoje??? Veliko nastopa tukaj, pa tudi tisti ponco. Skratka, teoretiki… dokazujejo svetu.
No, kdor je bral Malega princa, bo stekal, da ni maral teoreticnih znanstvenikov, danes bi Mali princ imel se planet internetofilov.

Postavila si dobronamerno vprasanje, pa vidis, da ga obvladujejo teoretiki. Le nekaj pametnih odgovorov.

Manja, lahko ti pošljem še del teksta z navodili, kaj in kako s tem pojavom lahko počneš da si izboljšaš seks, pa bi rajši po mailu, tu je preveč norčevanja iz teh stvari.

Veš da ne bom maila tukaj puščala, da me še bolj napadejo! :-))
A hvala za dobronamernost! Je lepo vedet, da je še par pametnih/dobrih ljudi na svetu! 😉
Lp